Sunday 1 November 2015

Agriculture Marketing



India’s Pulse Rate

Year 2015 has not been the only year in which availability of pulses in Indian market has been short of its demand. The total pulse’s production in the country has always been short of its total demand by 12 to 14%. This demand has been met through imports of pulses. There has not been unprecedented rise in demand of pulses in the country in the current year to justify its price rise this year by 100% to 150% to around Rs. 200/- per Kg. On the contrary the production of Pulses in the country has substantially risen during the last few years. There has also not been any change in the exim policy affecting pulses import and yet if the common man’s plate is devoid of pulses it is astonishing. It calls for an analysis of the situation. After all how minimum has been the government (regulation / control) today that maximum has been the governance (its impact in terms of biting pulse rate).

One most common pointer that generally appears in the Indian market is the role (rather undue role) of stockiest effecting restrictive trade practices. Recent raids on them evidence this pointer. The second pointer could be lack of timely and adequate import of pulses to make up the shortfall of supply in the market and pulses importers’ recent proposition to government for a permission to stock more quantity of pulses goes in support of this pointer. The third pointer is the availability of substitute pulses like in the past Mother Dairy (in form of sale of Matar Dal) had done and in the present some private traders have now started doing in form of “Moth Dal” but by then the situation has already worsened. One final pointer appears, to me, is the presence of a complex gamut of middlemen, not just middlemen but a complex gamut of middlemen in the pulses trades and their internal permutation and combination such as those of wholesalers, retailers, importers, stockiest, government officials, politicians (not to be kept away from this whole episode of pulses) etc. It is a known fact that presence of middlemen in agriculture sector has been lethal for the farmers and the consumers. The dairying in India has shown how to fight with them and eradicate their presence from milk business through PMPCS – Primary Milk Producers’ Cooperative Societies. India is therefore rightly today the largest milk producing nation of the world. Kudos to dairy farmers. We need to do some sort of similar thing to say Kudos to Pulses growing farmers.

Let’s rethink and renovate.

Prof. H. M. Jha “Bidyarthi”. Shegaon (Maharashtra)

Wednesday 28 October 2015

`Development Sustainablity’ means ‘Development Equity’



According to “Brundtland Report” by World Commission for Environment and Development 1987
Sustainable Development is the development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Let us examine this definition first from the Present to Future Concept of Sustainability and Development. There are three categories of population – i) The Impacting Population ii) The Impacted Population and iii) The Common Population. The Development Sustainability from Impacting Population Perspectives relates to a very small population who may be called as elites and who brought about outstanding developments for the humanity such as astronaut Rakesh Sharma etc. The Development Sustainability from Impacted Population Perspectives relates to a comparatively larger population than the first category of population who have been beneficiaries of the developments by the former. But the Development Sustainability from Common Population Perspectives relates to the largest population who are the victims of the so called development and hence not sustainable development. This population remains devoid of sweetness of development fruits and happens to be the Victims of sourness of development fruits – natural calamities like floods, tsunami, cyclone, drought, famine, wars etc. -  and hence Lopsided development that forces us to opine - Is this the world to live in?

Let us now look at the same definition from the other way round i.e. Past to Present Concept of Sustainability and Development. We live in present the foundation of which was laid down in the past and this present is going to become past tomorrow. Should we therefore continue laying down the similar foundations as those by our forefathers? The answer is definitely a big “NO”. Hence need to think of Development Equity. There has been several MANAGEMENT PARADIGMS to cause equitable development conceived and (being or proposed to be) implemented by people in the present. Some of these are listed below:

-Deep ecology and not Frontier Economics
-Welfare economics of Prof. Amartya Sen
-Inclusive Growth of Dr. Man Mohan Singh
-Inclusive Finance of Shri P. Chitambaram
-Sabka Sath Sabka Vikas of Shri Narendra Modi
-Digital economy – Shreshtha Bharat
-Green economy & environmental sustainability – Swaccha Bharat
-Economic sustainability - Swabhimani Bharat
-Social sustainability – by Bandhan & Shri Satyarthy
-Doom and gloom of global commons
-Eco-development and political economy

And hence finally Participatory development – equity – which translates the Vedic rhymes Vasudhaiv kutumbkam for the entire humanity.

Prof. H. M. Jha "Bidyarthi", Shegaon